Years ago, when I was a young engineering director, I made the acquaintance of Professor Henry Mintzberg:
He is one of the classic management thinkers, like Drucker and Handy. He has plenty to say about numerous aspects of management but the area of particular interest to me is on how managers get better at their practice of management and how we can help them do this.
Henry Mintzberg is most known for his studies of working
managers:
“…I studied managers
and what did I say in my first book (The Nature of Managerial Work, 1973) that
got the most attention; that managers are interrupted a lot, that it’s a very
action oriented thing. That was patently obvious to anybody who ever managed,
or spent a day observing a manager. So what makes me so special? Nothing, I
just wrote it down, that’s all. … I said: ‘Gee, it’s not what everybody says.
This is not planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling, to take the
most popular words to describe management. This is about getting interrupted,
and trying to keep your head above water.’ And everyone said, ‘Wow… geez… so
fantastic…’.
Some 25 years after he first begun studying managers, Professor Mintzberg came to a powerful conclusion on how managers get better at their job based on his real world understanding of what managers actually do. He articulated this in his book Managers not MBAs (2003),:
“Thoughtful reflection on natural experience, in the light of conceptual ideas is the most powerful tool we have for management learning.”
A growing
number MBA and EMBA programs are adopting Professor Mintzberg’s methodology,
displacing the dominant lecture or case study method. Even Nitin
Nohria, the new Dean of Harvard
Business School (the bastion of the case study method) is moving
through with radical change in the way young MBAs are developed. The new focus
is on helping young managers learn through reflection on their experience.
I began experimenting with the application of Mintzberg’s ideas
while I was that young engineering director looking for a way to develop myself
and my team in the midst of the dot.com meltdown of the early 2000s . I began
bringing my management team together on a regular basis for learning meetings.
I modified the course material and lecture PowerPoints supplied by Professor
Mintzberg and his colleagues to guide 90 minutes of reflection and discussion.
These “topics” gave us the pedagogy, Professor Mintzberg gave us the
experiential reflective approach, and doing this together as a team made the
learning happen.
Many years later I stumbled across the 70:20:10 framework (through Jay Cross and Charles Jennings). I quickly realized that
Mintzberg’s approach fit squarely within the 70:20:10 framework. It integrated
reflection, the power of social learning, and allowed participants to
contextualize their experiences through structured knowledge. Mintzberg’s
approach to leadership development encompassed all of 70:20:10 in one. This is
in contrast to many current methodologies that seem to put learning activities
into 70, 20 or 10 “buckets”.
In 2007, Henry Mintzberg and I co-founded the company,
CoachingOurselves (http://www.CoachingOurselves.com/).
We brought Mintzberg’s approach to the enterprise learning space by working
with leading management thinkers to provide topics, the themed discussion
workbooks.
Management teams use these
during 90-minute discussion and reflection “meetings”. L&OD piece these together to deliver
interventions and programs that solve the classic needs (“I need to develop a
culture of innovation”, “I need a high potential leadership program”, “I need
to deal with our engagement challenges”), but in a balanced 70:20:10 approach.
In 2012, we had over 10,000 managers in 130 organizations using our topics.
The results have been beyond my initial expectations, but
not without difficulties and surprises. The hardest challenge is changing the
dominant L&OD mindset with the organization. Even when the HR team believes
in 70:20:10 or the CEO is a big Mintzberg fan, it sometimes takes months, even
years, before this very different approach can be embedded into a new
initiative, piloted, and launched.
So, if you are having trouble changing your L&OD
programs into 70:20:10 based initiatives, there is only ones olution: start now,contact us to start with a CoachingOurselves pilot, and learn from that experience!
The end result will be worth it.
The end result will be worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment